Site Map  |   View Cart   |  Bookmark   |  Contact

 
arrow The Unitegrity Epidemic
arrow Integrity: Enlightened Self-Interest
arrow My Forthcoming Books
arrow Integrity Blog

Integrity Blog

Archive for the '6. Disregarding Highest Good' Category

Clouding Our Capacity for Discernment

Friday, September 14th, 2007

In yet another example of how leaders, political pundits and many others are helping to crush the public’s capacity to discern fact from spin, President Bush role-modeled this very problem during his speech last night. For the facts, click here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20766644

If this practice were a one-time aberration, or if only a few people did it, well… there are always a few rotten apples. But, it is being role-modeled every day in every way by far too many political, business and even some religious leaders, by lobbyists, by media pundits and talk radio hosts, and by everyday people across the political and ideological spectrum. After all, if so many leaders do it, it must be okay, right?

The truth is that is practice of making it impossible to distinguish supposed facts from actual spin clouds everyone’s capacity for discernment. This widespread practice renders even the most well-meaning people unable to make informed decisions despite their best intentions. This example of widespread lack of integrity undermines the very foundation of democracy and free society.

It is time for people across the political, ideological and advocacy spectrum to start insisting to the leaders, advocates and commentators that they support cease this practice once and for all. We need to focus less on attacking the “other side” for doing this and focus more on using our power where it can be felt, through insisting that “our side” stop doing this.

Michael Vick is Painful Example of Being Out of Integrity With the Collective & as a Leader

Saturday, August 25th, 2007

Michael Vick is the now-indefinitely suspended Atlanta Falcons NFL quarterback who pleaded guilty earlier this week to charges related to funding the ugly and cruel business of dog-fighting matches and then gambling on the outcomes of the matches. He provides a particularly chilling and painful example of lack of two forms of integrity: Collective Integrity and Leadership Integrity.

By way of background, when most people think of integrity, they tend to focus most on Relationship Integrity. The most talked-about aspect of Relationship Integrity has to do with saying what we mean and meaning what we say. This includes making commitments we actually complete, keeping others informed in a timely way when our commitments need to change, and taking responsibility for consequences when we don’t follow through on a commitment or we don’t re-negotiate it in a timely way if it needs to change. There are more aspects of Relationship Integrity than this. I cover them in my book The New IQ: How Integrity Intelligence Serves You, Your Relationships and Our World, to be released in January 2008.

In addition to Relationship Integrity, there are three other aspects of integrity: Personal Integrity, Collective Integrity and Leadership Integrity. I cover all of these as well in The New IQ. Personal Integrity is about being whole and complete, which on a practical level begins with proper self-care rather than self-neglect or self-indulgence. It also includes more than that. In The New IQ I translate being “whole and complete” from a vague philosophical concept into specific day-to-day behaviors so that this aspect of integrity becomes do-able and useful.

Michael Vick illustrates being out of integrity with the other two aspects of integrity. He serves us all in a backhanded way, however, through providing an example of the kind of huge damage that is caused by lack of Collective and Leadership Integrity. It is these to aspects of integrity that I will feature in this post.

Vick was a leader, not simply of his Atlanta Falcons professional football team, but in a far more fundamental way that every single one of us is a leader: he was a role-model. It does not matter what a professional athlete thinks about whether or not s/he should be seen as a role-model. For instance, professional athletes have no control over the fact that they are looked up to by many children (and others too). The “what is” is that they are. Their choice to become professional athletes is their choice to decide what kind of relationship they will have with the fact that they will be seen as role-models. Vick’s abdication of Leadership Integrity harms children’s ability to look up to professional athletes. Beyond that, whether he likes it or not, Vick role-modeled awful things about males, professional athletes, and blacks. And this is just for starters!

Vick’s abdication of Leadership Integrity is also an abdication of Collective Integrity. A crucial aspect of integrity has to do with serving the highest good of the collectives of which we are a part. That is what Collective Integrity is all about. For starters, Vick is part of the following collectives: humanity, males, Americans, blacks, athletes and professional football players, and his own Atlanta Falcons team. Let us take a closer look at two of these aspects of Collective Integrity.
At the level of Collective Integrity with humanity, Vick abdicated our responsibility as members of humanity to be stewards of our planet. As part of this we have a responsibility to treat other creatures (in Vick’s case dogs) with honor and respect. Vick’s guilty plea indicates that he funded cruelty (dog fights) and also bankrolled betting on which dog could damage the other dog more (gambling). This dishonors and disrespects these creatures. Absolutely no version of collective highest good is being served by this.

At the level of Collective Integrity with his own Atlanta Falcons football team, Michael Vick abdicated his responsibility to his team. By making his own interest in harming dogs and gambling on dog fights more important than the team he led as its quarterback, he let down his team members and the owners of the team who invested a huge amount of money in an incredibly financially lucrative contact. He basically said to them that his self-centered desire to do what he wanted to do was more important than the horrible repercussions his being caught would cause to the Atlanta Falcons.

This is, to me, a classic example of one of the cornerstones of lack of Collective Integrity that has reached epidemic proportions in our world: entitlement. Vick appears to me to have believed that he was entitled to get away with breaking United States law as well as the ethics policies of the National Football League. He appears to me to have believed that those laws and ethics policies did not apply to him; that his super-star status should exempt him from having to obey them. I don’t know this for sure because I have no idea what inner motivations led to his choices. This is just what his behaviors imply to me.

What I do know is that Michael Vick is not a victim. He is an adult who made out-of-integrity choices and is responsible for the results his choices led to. Vick is now beginning to experience those consequences. At least he did not pull the all-too-popular stunt that so many try to pull these days: pleading innocent to what they know they are guilty of in order to escape having to experience the natural consequences of their choices to live out of integrity.

I applaud Michael Vick for taking this first step in bringing himself back into integrity. I believe he has many more steps to take before his journey back into integrity regarding this particular incident is complete. But that is another story for another time.

I also applaud Roger Goodell, the Commissioner of the NFL, for placing Vick on indefinite suspension (as of this posting) as a consequence of Vick’s actions. Goodell, in my opinion, has been taking vitally important steps during this past year toward restoring the integrity of the NFL through enforcing its own ethics and code-of-conduct policies. (I applaud his actions in The New IQ as well.) I hope this post makes it into Goodell’s hands because I would love to provide an Integrity Intelligence training program for NFL rookies as part of the life skills training the NFL so wisely offers them!

Political Aspirations Trump Integrity

Monday, June 18th, 2007

Here is a story straight from the news providing an example of a prosecutor’s political aspirations being more important than his integrity.  This fellow seems to have made his desire to be elected to a higher office more important than whether he wreck the lives of innocent people.  It cost him not only his position but his right to practice as an attorney.  Yet, still he would not take full responsibility for what he did.  Read for yourself from the following excerpts (for the complete story, go to
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070617/ap_on_re_us/duke_lacrosse_94;_ylt=AsXojDh40yiYM3nf.q_cxbJlM3wV):

By AARON BEARD, Associated Press Writer

RALEIGH, N.C. - District Attorney Mike Nifong was disbarred Saturday for his “selfish” rape prosecution of three Duke University lacrosse players — a politically motivated act, his judges said, that he inexplicably allowed to fester for months after it was clear the defendants were innocent.

The three-member disciplinary committee… stripped the veteran prosecutor of his state law license.

Even Nifong and his attorneys supported the decision, though the veteran prosecutor refused to admit to the end that no crime occurred at a March 2006 lacrosse team party.

The committee said Nifong manipulated the investigation to boost his chances of winning his first election for Durham County district attorney. In doing so, he committed “a clear case of intentional prosecutorial misconduct” that involved “dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation.”

F. Lane Williamson [the chairman of the three-member disciplinary committee that stripped the veteran prosecutor of his state law license] specifically cited Nifong’s comments in the early days of the case, which included a confident proclamation at a candidate forum that he wouldn’t allow Durham to become known for “a bunch of lacrosse players from Duke raping a black girl.” He also called the lacrosse team “a bunch of hooligans” at one point.

Appointed district attorney in 2005, Nifong was in a tight race for the office when a stripper told police she was raped at the party.

“At the time he was facing a primary, and yes, he was politically naive,” Williamson said. “But we can draw no other conclusion that those initial statements he made were to further his political ambitions.”

During the ethics trial, Nifong acknowledged he knew there was no DNA evidence connecting Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty to the 28-year-old accuser when he indicted them on charges of rape, sexual offense and kidnapping. Nifong later charged Dave Evans with the same crimes. But months later, state prosecutors concluded the three players were “innocent” — a fact Williamson hammered home on Saturday.

“We acknowledge the actual innocence of the defendants, and there’s nothing here that has done anything but support that assertion,” Williamson said.

Williamson said it appeared that throughout his investigation, Nifong was looking for any evidence to link a lacrosse player to the accuser’s story in order to support his initial comments that he was sure an attack occurred.

“He’s already out there,” Williamson said. “He’s way out there by then. He looks foolish if he does not go forward.”

One of the most serious ethics violations Nifong was found to have committed involved his failure to turn over DNA test results that identified genetic material from several men — but no members of the lacrosse team — in the accuser’s underwear and body.

In court documents and hearings in May, June and September, Nifong told two different judges that he had no more evidence that could be considered helpful to the defense…
Nifong declined to comment Saturday while quietly slipping out of the courthouse through a side door, but his attorney had announced earlier — after the committee concluded he broke the rules — that Nifong considered disbarment an appropriate punishment. Nifong had already pledged to resign his $110,000-a-year job as district attorney, and he will not appeal…

A Crisis of Discernment

Saturday, April 28th, 2007

After a long hiatus from posting to this Integrity Blog, I am resuming posts to the extent that my time allows. This post may sound like it is political but I assure you it is not. This post is about lack of integrity in journalism.

Bill Moyers, in his special on April 25, 2007, has had the courage and integrity to provide what I believe to be a journalistically responsible exposé of just how out of integrity the mainstream United States press has become. He has has dared to criticize both what others have branded the “liberal” press and the “conservative” press for having abdicated their journalistic responsibility to be discerning in their reporting.

I cannot strongly enough recommend that you set aside the time to watch this profoundly important piece of journalism. The URL to view it is:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html
The reporting by both conservatives and liberals prior to and immediately following the invasion of Iraq was drastically and consistently out of integrity with the facts. It made a mockery of the sacred responsibility the press has in a democracy to investigate claims made and to report facts the public needs in order to distinguish between propaganda and truth.
I believe the time has come for the American people to rise up in the most important revolution of our time: an Integrity Revolution. It is time for us to demand that the press stop using “pundits” espousing opposing propaganda spins as a replacement for responsible, balanced, truly investigative journalism.

Pundits debating on television and podcasts may be a form of entertainment for some. But, journalism goes over the line when from journalism into propaganda when news media use pundits as substitutes for having their own reporters uncover and report the very facts that the pundits are in the business of omitting in order to forward their own spin.

It is time for the American people to reclaim their responsibility they have to be discerning instread of being susceptible to being taken in by the powerful propgaganda machines that have replaced responsible government and a responsible media.

It is time for the American people to demand that all news media return to uncovering truth rather than promoting propaganda. It is time for the American people, and American business, to start refusing to patronize or support media outlets whose news departments are out of integrity with their sacred responsibility in a democracy to reveal the facts rather than promulgate propaganda.

Again, I cannot strongly enough recommend that you set aside the time to watch this profoundly important piece of journalism. The URL to view it is:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html

While you’re on Bill Moyers’ page, check out Jon Stewart’s insightful comments about the press:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04272007/profile.html

To read more about Discernment, one of the Seven WisePassions of 3D Integrity™, visit the WisePassions™ section of my website:
http://www.willingness.com/sevenwise.html

Watchdog Targets Media Lying by Omission

Sunday, November 19th, 2006

For the past 27 years, Project Censored, a program based at Sonoma State University, in Rohnert Park, California, has compiled a list of the top 25 underreported stories from around the country. This year’s list, arranged and reviewed by approximately 200 students and faculty, again contains stories that, for whatever reason, were deemed unfit for American eyes by the mainstream media.

Censorship is lying by omission. With very few exceptions (such as not disclosing military strategy during wartime situations, for instance), censorship is the opposite of serving highest collective good.

Censorship is not only done by governments. In the United States, which prides itself on having a constitution that guarantees a “free press,” censorship is being practiced by major news networks such as Fox and CNN. (Censorship has also been practiced at times by drug companies who withhold damning data from the research studies they publish in medical journals — Vioxx is a particularly well-documented example — but that is another story for another time.)

Fox is one of many examples of news network that has a clear political agenda that it is forwarding, which in turn determines how it slants news stories the stories it features and the stories it buries.

Burying a story is a euphemism for censorship. But, by calling censorship by a less ugly name, the media are able to fool an undiscerning public into believing they are receiving objective reporting.

This is not only an example of lack of integrity. It is downright dangerous. When people form opinions erroneously believing they are basing them on objective truth, they make decisions about, for instance, who they vote for, based on incomplete pictures. This, in turn, can result in the public unknowing supporting corruption or in supporting foreign policies that damage their country’s standing in the international community rather than strengthen it.

I therefore applaud Project Censored for their efforts to bring into public awareness this most dangerous form of unintegrity.

What’s YOUR opinion? Register yourself now so you can post on this blog!

U.S. Elections & A Call For Integrity

Wednesday, November 8th, 2006

One of the most frequent reasons given for the why people in the U.S. so widely voted to oust Republicans on Election Day had less to do with political affiliation and more to do with an issue that transcends political party: Integrity. The way the voters put into words their change of heart had to do with being fed up with scandals. Are the American people beginning to wake up to the fact that putting people in office who have high integrity is more important than their politcal party or ideological beliefs? I sure hope so. How about you?

Disregarding Highest Good: Unintegrity Pandemic Variety #6

Saturday, October 28th, 2006

Disregarding highest good means achieving short-term wants or success at the expense of long-term price or what is more truly in my highest interests, or getting what is truly in my highest interests in ways that make it harder for you to get what is truly in your highest interests. We can disregard personal highest good, the highest good of a relationship or the highest good of the smaller and larger systems of which we are a part (such as our family, community, business, culture, religion, country, the planet, etc.).

Narcissism, greed, addictions, greed and pathological opportunism (taking advantage of opportunities even when they will harm others) are all examples of disregarding highest good.

Examples of Disregarding Highest Good: Everyday Narcissism

First Example: People who park on or over the line in parking spots, making it impossible to safely use the next spot over. Lack of common courtesy is one of the most rampant forms of the Disregarding Highest Good variety of the Unintegrity Pandemic.

Second Example: Sticking with the driving theme, you are sitting at a traffic light waiting for it to turn green. The traffic going from your left to your right is thick and backing up.

Even so, cars keep going into the intersection, clogging it up without regard for the fact that the light will change before they make it through to the other side. Your light turns green but you cannot go anywhere because one of those cars is blocking you and has no where to go. The cars behind you start to honk at you to go, not able to see that you have nowhere to go and are just as exasperated as them.

You glare at the driver clogging the intersection. He gives you the finger. Or maybe he just seems to pretend he doesn’t even see what is happening. No acknowledgment, no apology, and probably no chance he will handle this situation any differently in future similar circumstances.

This is a classic example of everyday narcissism. Essentially, narcissism says that there can only be one most important or privileged person here and it’s me. It’s not my problem if others are inconvenienced. It’s their turn anyway, after all the ways others have inconvenienced me.

Merely calling this self-centered behavior falls short of the mark. This is yet one more example of an arrogant flavor of Unintegrity. Think about how many times during the day you or others engage in this or some other kind of Unintegrity. You may have privately or publicly criticized yourself or them for being selfish. But how often have you really looked at these behaviors as examples of being out integrity?

If you are like most of us, the answer is, not very often. If we as a culture and as a planet knew how to recognize all the flavors the Unintegrity Pandemic takes, there would be no need for a chapter like this one.

Another Example of Unintegrity through Disregarding Highest Good: A Culture of Debting

Before providing this example. I first want to say that I do not believe that all forms of debt are examples of Unintegrity. One common example of what I would consider Integrity-based debt is taking out a conventional mortgage to purchase a home, when the monthly payments include 100% of the principle and interest due. Taking out a loan to reasonable start or expand a business is another example. So is taking out an education loan, assuming you will make enough when you’re done so you can justify taking out the loan. Keep this in mind when I now talk about other forms of debt as an Unintegrity issue.

Debt is one of the most widespread forms of Unintegrity that exists.

Governments regularly create debt to pay for more than they can afford today, by leaving it to future generations to clean up the mess, if it even gets that far. During the 20th century, a couple of countries had accumulated such massive national debt that they would have collapsed had the World Bank not forgiven and/or restructured billions of dollars of loans. Italy’s birth rate has decreased so substantially that there are now nowhere near enough young people to cover the cost of the baby boomer generation’s social security bills as they retire. One of the first big government debt scandals of the 21st century in the United States was the city of San Diego, California. The seventh largest city in the country drove itself into such severe debt, and a subsequent cover-up, that Wall Street stopped allowing San Diego to issue municipal bonds, and the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated an investigation, as did multiple federal agencies.

On San Diego’s behalf, I do want to add that I believe its leaders as of 2006 are committed to correcting the debting, corruption and secrecy that led to this awful example of Unintegrity, and to restore San Diego to a model of Integrity in government.

Businesses too often create huge debt to pay for an almost obsessive need to grow as large as possible as quickly as possible. The kind of debt I am talking about jeopardizes a company’s long-term viability or causes the company to have to inflate its short-term prices in ways that make them less competitive in the marketplace.

Individuals figure that if irresponsible debt is okay for government and business, then it must be okay for them too. Credit card companies do their best to legitimatize this. The consequence is that consumer credit card debt has grown to utterly astronomical proportions. And this is despite it being virtually universally recognized that this does not serve either the highest good of individual stress levels or long-term economic stability.

A Final Example of Unintegrity through Disregarding Highest Good: Internet Spam & Junk Faxes

Those who engage in internet spamming and junk faxes have no regard for how they are imposing on the unwitting recipients of the garbage they send. I spend an average total of about a half hour each day just weeding out and eliminating spam from my e-mails before I start looking at the e-mails that were actually intended for me. Invasion of privacy, which is what this amounts to, is an excellent everyday example of blatant disregard of highest good. Spammers and junk fax senders offer yet another example of how widespread is the Unintegrity Pandemic.

Preface About Unintegrity Examples

Saturday, October 28th, 2006

I offer you a couple of warnings before I launch into the examples:

  1. This is Not About Blame: As I said above, the purpose of this chapter is not to lay blame but to expand your awareness of the range of ways in which Unintegrity expresses itself. Because I see the Unintegrity Pandemic as a systemic problem, I hold to blame no one individual, culture, religion, organization, business, profession, political party, governmental agency, country and organization of countries. I propose instead that each one of us has a huge role to play in solving this problem. Each individual, culture, religion, country, organization, business, profession, political party, governmental agency, country or organization of countries. So, as you read the rest of this chapter, I ask you to not dwell upon the question of who is at fault. Rather, simply open your eyes to how pervasive the Unintegrity problem is, so you can begin to focus on the solution (an integrity revolution), instead of continuing to view each of these illustrations as separate problems needing to be addressed separately.
  2. Refrain From Despair: While it might be tempting to throw your hands up in despair as you read about the magnitude and pervasiveness of the Unintegrity Pandemic, please keep in mind that this book is about a solution to this problem. Only this chapter is about the problem itself. I therefore urge you to treat this chapter as a call to consciousness and as a means to motivate, not as an invitation to despair.
  3. Examples Cross Categories: I have placed the examples you are about to read into individual categories to make it easier to understand each category. In reality, though, most of these Unintegrity illustrations could just as easily have been used to illustrate other categories as well. So, if you find yourself thinking, “This example could have been an illustration of arrogance as greed,” that is probably true.